)
The Composition Point
Everyone keeps asking which AI is going to win, as if the whole field is about to collapse into one model the way every gadget collapsed into the smartphone. That's the wrong question.
Models are becoming a commodity. Open-weight versions trail the frontier by months, not years, and they're getting cheaper and easier to swap. What's actually converging isn't the model. It's the place you go to start work that crosses many systems. For 20 years that place was a vendor console, and every vendor fought to own it. Now it's increasingly an AI agent, one that carries your memory, your files, and your authorized connections to every system you touch.
That shift exposes how much of IT and security work is still broken. Signals pile up faster than teams can triage them. Remediation windows have shrunk from weeks to days. Agents are already in the workflow. And most teams are still stitching it together with disconnected tools, manual handoffs, and reporting that tracks activity instead of outcomes.
The work moved to the agent. The workflows didn't.
Most vendors will respond to this by bolting an agent into their own console and calling it an AI strategy. That fights the shift instead of riding it. The harder problem, and the one that matters, isn't intelligence. It's action that can be trusted and verified. An agent that misreads a fact gives you a wrong answer. An agent that thinks it patched 4,000 endpoints when it didn't gives you an incident.
That's the bet Automox is making. The agents already exist. The composition point already belongs to you. The scarce thing is a platform trustworthy enough to hand the keys.
I've written up the full argument in a short paper, The Composition Point. If you own IT or security operations and you're trying to figure out what agentic actually means for the way your team works, start there.
)
)
)
)